Advanced Search

Submit Manuscript

Volume 28, No 9, Sep 2018

ISSN: 1001-0602 
EISSN: 1748-7838 2018 
impact factor 17.848* 
(Clarivate Analytics, 2019)

Volume 28 Issue 9, September 2018: 958-961

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Cryo-EM structure of the human α5β3 GABAA receptor

Si Liu 1, Lingyi Xu 2, Fenghui Guan 2, Yun-Tao Liu 3,4,5, Yanxiang Cui 6,Qing Zhang 7,8, Xiang Zheng 2, Guo-Qiang Bi 3,4,5,9, Z. Hong Zhou 10,11, Xiaokang Zhang 7,8 and Sheng Ye 2,12

1Life Sciences Institute and School of Medicine, Zhejiang University,Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P. R. China; 2Life Sciences Institute and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Zhejiang University,Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P. R. China; 3Center for Integrative Imaging, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, and School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui 230026, P. R. China; 4School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P. R. China; 5CAS Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei, Anhui 230026, P. R. China; 6Electron Imaging Center for Nanomachines, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; 7Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P. R. China; 8Center of Cryo Electron Microscopy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P. R. China; 9CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P. R. China; 10 Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; 11 California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA and 12 School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072,P. R. China Correspondence: Correspondence: Z Hong Zhou (hong.zhou@ucla.edu) or Xiaokang Zhang (xzhang1965@zju.edu.cn) or Sheng Ye(sye@zju.edu.cn)These authors contributed equally: Liu S, Xu L and Guan F.

Dear Editor,

γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors mediate rapid inhibitory neurotransmission by opening a chloride selective pore in response to binding of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and thus are vital for controlling excitability in the brain.1 Dysfunctional GABAA receptors are directly involved in the pathogenesis of many neurologic diseases and psychiatric disorders.2 Moreover, GABAA receptors are modulated, directly activated or inhibited by over hundreds of pharmacologically and clinically important compounds of different structural classes.3 As members of Cys loop-type ligand-gated ion channel superfamily that also includes nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, glycine receptors and serotonin type 3 receptor, human GABAA receptors are typically heteropentamers assembled from a repertoire of 19 different subunits (α, β, γ, δ, ε, θ, π, and ρ subunits), giving rise to a spectrum of GABAA receptor subtypes with different subunit compositions and arrangements, as well as distinct biophysical and pharmacological properties.1,4 Although the subunit stoichiometries and arrangements of functional GABAA receptor subtypes have been intensively investigated in the last two decades, the assembling principles of these receptor subtypes remain unknown.4 The unique property that keeps GABAA receptors apart from other members of the Cys-loop superfamily is the activating ligand GABA. Early studies with reconstituted recombinant receptors have revealed that robust GABA-activated channel formation occurred with combinations of α and β subunits.5 All Cys-loop receptors share a similar neurotransmitter binding pocket formed at the extracellular interface between two adjacent subunits by three loops from the principle (+) and three loops/strands from the complementary (−) subunits; and the pocket at the extracellular β(+)/α(−) interface is a GABA-binding site.3 However, how GABA selectively binds at the interface, and how the binding signal is transmitted quickly and efficiently to open an integral ion channel remains elusive, significantly limiting our understanding of the ligand-gating mechanism of the GABAA receptors.


https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0077-8

FULL TEXT | PDF

Browse 886